MantisBT - MEGA
View Issue Details
0000488MEGA[All Projects] Feedbackpublic2017-06-30 03:242017-07-10 12:25
guest 
gstecher 
normalminorhave not tried
resolvedno change required 
MEGA 11 (Graphical Interface version) 
 
Louis
Klopper
lklopper@mweb.com
lklopper@mweb.com
0000488: Ideal hardware for best performance
I'm battling to find detail on hardware that can be utilizes. e.g. Does MEGA benefit from a GPU and which GPU's will give best performance.
No tags attached.
Issue History
2017-06-30 03:24guestNew Issue
2017-07-10 12:22gstecherFile Deleted: BOWMTDNA.MEG
2017-07-10 12:25gstecherNote Added: 0003824
2017-07-10 12:25gstecherStatusnew => resolved
2017-07-10 12:25gstecherResolutionopen => no change required
2017-07-10 12:25gstecherAssigned To => gstecher

Notes
(0000390)
AndrewSegbeya   
1969-12-31 17:33   
Alex
  Thanks for this nasty one. I spent two hours just trying to get this sorted out. I found that the problem is not of bug as much as that of bias. Because many ratios are incalculable (many pairs have no tranversions and even transitions), many ratios are invalid and their average compounds the problem. This happens under all distance methods for estimating R. Therefore, a better way of dealing with this is to compute avg. ts and avg tv, and then take the ratio. In fact, even that is not necessary if you were to use our new method (Maximum composite likelihood [MCL], which will be included in the new version soon). I will update the help file and caution people to not use average R approach (instead, they should employ the alternatives).
  In a future version, I might disable this option and only provide MCL based R estiamtes.
Sudhir
(0003824)
gstecher   
2017-07-10 12:25   
Hi Louis,

I am writing in response to your question regarding the MEGA software. No, MEGA will not benefit much by using a high-end GPU as it is not implemented for that kind of parallelization.

--
Best regards,

Glen Stecher
Institute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine
igem.temple.edu