Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2024-11-22 14:03 MST |
My View | View Issues | Report Issue | Change Log | Roadmap | My Account |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||
0000117 | MEGA | Documentation | public | 2016-04-11 06:53 | 2016-04-18 08:53 | ||||
Reporter | guest | ||||||||
Assigned To | gstecher | ||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||
Status | resolved | Resolution | no change required | ||||||
Platform | OS | ||||||||
Product Version | |||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||
Summary | 0000117: How does Mega parse newick trees integer IDs on leaves | ||||||||
Description | Hello, I am representing QIAGEN Bioinformatics (CLC Genomics Workbench etc.), and I am writing to you because we recently discovered that our importers do not interpret newick trees exported from Mega correctly when it contains nodes with integer IDs. For example, we will interpret the following tree as having nodes with bootstrap values 1, 2, 3, and 4, while MEGA seems to interpret these values as IDs: ( ( 1:1.0, 2:7.0 )3:1.0, 4:3.0 ); We will interpret the same tree as having IDs 1, 2, 3, and 4 if these values are quoted in the newick file. I am curious how you parse these trees. Do you simply assume that any number attached to an internal node is a bootstrap value, and any number attached to a leaf is an ID? We would consider to do the same if this is what you are doing. Best regards, Andreas Sand | ||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
Attach Tags | (Separate by ",") | ||||||||
First Name | Andreas Sand | ||||||||
Last Name | Pedersen | ||||||||
Andreas.Pedersen@qiagen.com | |||||||||
Confirm Email | Andreas.Pedersen@qiagen.com | ||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||
Notes | |
(0003648) gstecher (administrator) 2016-04-18 08:53 |
Hi Andreas, I am writing in response to your question regarding how MEGA parses newick files. Yes, MEGA assumes that any number attached to an internal node is a bootstrap value (unless it is quoted, in which case it is an ID) and any number attached to a leaf is an ID. But a better way to handle numbers attached to internal nodes would be to ask the user how to interpret the values. This is because bootstrap values are associated with branches but IDs are associated with nodes. In the case where a user re-roots the tree, the interpretation of these values affects how they are displayed. As an example, you can look at how Dendroscope handles the situation. -- Best regards, Glen Stecher |
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2016-04-11 06:53 | guest | New Issue | |
2016-04-18 08:53 | gstecher | Note Added: 0003648 | |
2016-04-18 08:53 | gstecher | Status | new => resolved |
2016-04-18 08:53 | gstecher | Resolution | open => no change required |
2016-04-18 08:53 | gstecher | Assigned To | => gstecher |
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |