Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | 2024-11-22 17:08 MST |
My View | View Issues | Report Issue | Change Log | Roadmap | My Account |
View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | ||||||||
0002288 | MEGA | [All Projects] Feedback | public | 2020-10-13 12:13 | 2023-04-14 00:56 | ||||||||
Reporter | guest | ||||||||||||
Assigned To | gstecher | ||||||||||||
Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | ||||||||
Status | assigned | Resolution | open | ||||||||||
Platform | OS | ||||||||||||
Product Version | MEGA-CC 11 (command line version) | ||||||||||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||||||||||
Summary | 0002288: CPU use | ||||||||||||
Description | I'm trying to do some comparisons with Mega. When I run megacc it makes very little use of CPU time (well below 5% of a full CPU), both in Linux (top) and Windows (Task Man.). I tried to "nice" it in Linux, and change its prioriity in Windows (from the Task Man.), to no avail. Running the same dataset directly in MegaX (i.e. graphic interface, no *.mao file) makes full processor use. Thus, run times with megacc are much longer than with MegaX. We want our comparisons to be fair. Any advice? | ||||||||||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||||||
Attach Tags | (Separate by ",") | ||||||||||||
First Name | Pablo | ||||||||||||
Last Name | Goloboff | ||||||||||||
pablogolo@yahoo.com.ar | |||||||||||||
Confirm Email | pablogolo@yahoo.com.ar | ||||||||||||
Attached Files | |||||||||||||
Issue History | |||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
2020-10-13 12:13 | guest | New Issue | |
2020-10-20 13:59 | gstecher | Assigned To | => gstecher |
2020-10-20 13:59 | gstecher | Status | new => assigned |
2020-10-20 13:59 | gstecher | Note Added: 0004517 | |
2022-12-05 07:07 | guest | Note Added: 0005933 | |
2023-04-14 00:56 | guest | Note Added: 0006406 |
Copyright © 2000 - 2024 MantisBT Team |